Hi Axel,
When I first started using FPV I got very excited by the speed of use and uncluttered workspace but it soon became apparent that it wasn't going to speed up my workflow because although at that time I could cull and rate images quickly I would then have to go to Bridge or Breeze Browser to add and edit keywords and easily see which images had which ratings applied to them.
Everytime there has been an update I've excitedly installed it and re-evaluted my workflow.
I loved the redesign of the xmp window and its useability but hated the view filters window, it's so complicated and its use does not fit into the "fast" ethos of FPV.
Please consider 1-5 tick boxes for XMP ratings plus a tickbox for ALL ( the current setup does not allow viewing for example files rated 2 and 5 or 1 and 3 and dropping files out of the active window as they are rated is not possible, being able to untick an ALL box would accomplish this) Bridge uses this system and its very quick to use, or should I say "fast"
I looked forward to keywording being implemented but when it arrived I rejected its use within minutes
1. There was no way to easily select a non sequential range of files and apply a specific keyword to them.
2. There was no way to apply additional keywords to a selection of files that already had non identical keywords applied. ie. there was no merge facility. Breeze Browser does this well.
The promise of implementing controlled vocabulary was exciting as I was sure the ability to merge keywords would by then be possible. I currently use a modified copy of CVKC with Breeze Browser so know it works well.
Yesterday I installed the update and have to say the controlled vocabulary feature is fantastic especially the customisable auto search. This works far better than the current way B.B.pro does it. BUT there is still no merge feature which as far as I'm concerned makes the feature unusable.
Let me give you an example.
I photograph a band featuring singer A, guitarist B, drummer C. Some images will contain just A or B or C some will contain A+B or A+B+C or B+C
Using B.B.pro I select all images containing the singer and add keyword A. I then select all images of the guitarist and using merge feature add keyword B. I do the same with drummer D. In 3 steps I have a folder of images with keywords A,B,C,ABC,AB,AC, or BC. If I then remember I want to keyword all the files with the venue X. I select all files and merge X with them. 4 steps.
To do the same using FPV I would have to
1.select all images with just the singer and apply A. 2. select images of just the guitarist and apply B. 3. select all of just drummer and apply D. 4 select all images of singer and guitarist apply AB. 5. select all of just singer and drummer apply AD. 6. select images of guitarist and drummer and apply BC. If by now I haven't lost the will to live and decide to add venue X I have to select batches of each of the possible 7 permutations and add X to them. Thats 13 stages. At this point I would have to thank God the band didn't have a keyboard player.
In my opinion to make FPV really usable the features that need changing or adding are;
1. Tick boxes for the XMP rating filter. ( same for labels would be nice)
2. A way of temporally tagging a batch of images in the browser strip to add keywords or rank.
3. A merge keyword facility.
4. A delete keyword from selected files facility.
5. A nice touch would be to have a floating box with perhaps the first 5 or 6 labels that could have temporary annotations applied to them as reminders. Using the band example one could use Voc, Gtr, Drm. or perhaps Tom,Dck Hry
My current workflow involves downloadng using Chris Breeze's Downloader Pro adding global keywords at the same time. Mario's I-Match as my DAM program. I could cull and keyword in I-Match but find combination of FPV + Breeze Browser easier and faster. ( Would like to use just FPV) For RAW conversion I use Capture One.
Theres so many things I really love about FPV but its just not usable for me yet.